• Users Online: 428
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

Table of Contents
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 139-148

Dual therapeutic strategy targeting tumor cells and tumor microenvironment in triple-negative breast cancer

1 International Ph.D. Program in Medicine; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei; Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
2 International Ph.D. Program in Medicine; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei; Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City; Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan
3 Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei, Taiwan
4 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5 Department of Histology and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Medicine Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
6 International Ph.D. Program in Medicine; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei; Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Tri.Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan

Date of Submission27-Mar-2020
Date of Decision04-May-2020
Date of Acceptance20-May-2020
Date of Web Publication1-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Tsu- Yi Chao
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital, No. 291, Zhongzheng Rd., Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 23561
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/JCRP.JCRP_13_20

Rights and Permissions

Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by a lack of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu). Only 30% of TNBC patients show a pathologic complete response, and the other 70% of patients exhibit a less pronounced response followed by relapse and metastasis to distant organs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Achievements of immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in clinical trials for treating melanoma, nonsmall-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and TNBC suggest that targeting the interaction of tumor cells with tumor microenvironment is highly beneficial for cancer treatment. Finding a novel dual-targeting therapy against tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) may provide options for improved responses in TNBC patients. Data Sources: We searched the potential targeted therapy candidates that regulate tumor cells as well as the TME of cancer diseases, including TNBC, based on our previous and recent other publications. Study Selection: We selected the potential targeted therapies supported by relevance clinical data, in vitro and in vivo studies. Results: In this review, we found the KDM5B, Cadherin 11, β-catenin, CDK2, signal peptide CUB-EGF domain-containing protein 2, and PDL1 regulate the tumor cells and TME of TNBC cells. In addition, we also highlighted the Antrocin, Ovatodiolide, and Pterostilbene as natural small compound possess anti-cancer through the disruption of tumor cell–TME interactions. Conclusion: The new therapy approach targeting tumor cells-TME interaction may improve the response and survival rate of TNBC patients. Later, natural small compounds could provide alternative therapy options for TNBC patients.

Keywords: Targeted therapy, triple-negative breast cancer, tumor cell, tumor microenvironment

How to cite this article:
Satriyo PB, Yeh CT, Chen JH, Aryandono T, Haryana SM, Chao TY. Dual therapeutic strategy targeting tumor cells and tumor microenvironment in triple-negative breast cancer. J Cancer Res Pract 2020;7:139-48

How to cite this URL:
Satriyo PB, Yeh CT, Chen JH, Aryandono T, Haryana SM, Chao TY. Dual therapeutic strategy targeting tumor cells and tumor microenvironment in triple-negative breast cancer. J Cancer Res Pract [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 19];7:139-48. Available from: https://www.ejcrp.org/text.asp?2020/7/4/139/301904

  Introduction Top

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by a lack of ER, PR, and HER2. It has more aggressive clinical features and a worse prognosis than HR+ and HER2+ breast cancer subtypes. TNBC constitutes approximately 15% of all breast cancer subtypes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is the current standard therapy for TNBC. Among the breast cancer subtypes, TNBC is the most responsive to chemotherapy; however, disease relapse occurs in very early followed by distant metastasis, leading to death.[1]

The standard treatment for TNBC is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which involves a combination of anthracycline-and taxane-based drugs.[2] Only approximately 22% of TNBC patients achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC completion.[3] Another study showed that approximately 30% of TNBC patients achieve pCR.[4] Although the pRC rate is higher in TNBC patients compared with other breast cancer subtypes in response to NAC, 3-year progression-free survival and 3-year overall survival decline sharply in TNBC patients after NAC.[3] After NAC, 30%–50% of TNBC patients develop a resistant phenotype, leading to early recurrence, distant metastasis, and death.[2] The mechanism behind the chemoresistance of TNBC is still unclear.

Because of the heterogeneity of the cells in both genetically and phenotypically, TNBCs are clinically more aggressive than non-TNBC cells. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a niche consisting of cellular and noncellular parts surrounding tumor cells, which determines tumor initiation and disease progression. The complex interaction of tumor cells and the TME defines whether the primary tumor has been eradicated, relapsed, or developed into distant metastasis after getting treatment completion. A single therapy approach targeting either tumor cells or TMEs is insufficient to achieve a high rate of pCR against TNBC. In this review, we discuss the heterogeneity of TNBC cells as well as the TME. Furthermore, we detail several potential targeted therapies that regulate tumor cells and the TME of TNBC [Table 1]. In addition, we discuss the anticancer potential of natural small compounds through tumor cell inhibition and TME regulation against TNBC.
Table 1: Potential targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer

Click here to view

  Tumor Cell Heterogeneity Top

Carcinogenesis is the process by which somatic cells randomly mutate, leading to a change in their phenotype. This process repeatedly occurs to generate different clones. The unique fitness of cell clones is called the bulk of tumor cells.[5] The heterogeneity of each cell clone in bulk tumor cells due to nonuniform genetics during carcinogenesis provides the cells with different sensitivity levels to treatments, including chemotherapy. Although chemotherapy acts as to eradicate tumor cells, it also promotes molecular changes in tumor cells through a shift in the mutational spectrum. Following these mutational events, the new clones arising exhibit chemoresistant phenotypes.[6] TNBC cells have more genetic variations than any other breast cancer subtype. This phenomenon may explain the high early recurrence of TNBC after NAC. Clonal heterogeneity takes an important role in tumor progression. The drug-resistant clonal cells could become a dominant lead to relapse and distant organ metastasis.[7] Identifying a new approach that targets the most aggressive clonal cells in the bulk tumor is crucial for increasing the pCR of TNBC patients.

  Cancer Stem Cells Top

Initially, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been identified in patients with hematology-related cancers. This finding was followed by the first isolation of CSCs from solid tumors, breast cancer. This subset population of cells exhibits self-renewal ability and multidirectional differentiation. The breast CSCs express cluster of differentiation 44 positive (CD44+) and the cluster of differentiation 44 negative (CD24−). These cells could generate tumor bulk tissue when injected into immunodeficient mice. However, these CD44−/CD24+ lineage cells failed to grow in immunodeficient mice. This finding suggests the CD44+/CD24− exhibit self-renewal ability and differentiation ability generate the new tumor bulk tissue.[8] Both markers CD44 and CD24 have been widely used to isolate breast CSCs for revealing the role of breast CSCs in tumor progression, relapse, and distant metastasis. Growing evidence indicates that CSCs also exist in other solid tumors.[9]

In TNBC patients, the CD44+/CD24 − populations of cells at the tumor site have significant prognostic value. TNBC patients with a high expression of breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) markers have a significantly poorer overall survival rate than those with a low expression of BCSC markers. Anin vitro study showed that BCSCs exhibit high resistance to chemotherapy drugs.[10] Another study has revealed that BCSCs express more multidrug-resistant proteins than non-BCSCs.[11] Moreover, circulating cancer cells and new distant organ metastasis tumor tissues express more CSC markers than a primary tumor tissue from the same patient.[12]

CSCs also exhibit a unique metabolic phenotype. Many studies revealed that CSCs are more glycolic than non-CSCs in the tumor. The presence of glucose in the tumor microenvironment significantly increases the specific glucose metabolism pathway associated-genes (c-Myc, Glut-1, HK-1, HK-2, and PDK-2) in CSCs, which is increased the CSCs population in the cancer cell population.[13] Most of the studies reported the glycolytic is the main energy source for CSCs.[14] However, other studies revealed that quiescent or slow-proliferate CSCs are less glycolytic in breast cancer.[13] Further, increased the mitochondria numbers in breast cancer cells promote the stemness phenotype and enhanced the metastatic potential, as well as resistant to DNA damage, decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy agents.[14] The Myc and MCL1 crosstalk synergistically upregulate the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and reactive oxygen species led to an accumulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF-α) maintain the stemness phenotypes and drug-resistant in TNBC.[15] Growing evidence suggests the CSCs exhibit metabolic flexibility by switching metabolic phenotypes between glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation based on the location and energy demanding. In the tumor region with adequate oxygen and exhibit high proliferation rate, the CSCs mainly use both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to gain energy. While in the center hypoxic region, the glycolysis is the main energy source.[14] Due to these unique metabolic phenotypes of BCSCs, inhibiting glycolysis and or oxidative phosphorylation may attenuate the stemness and drug-resistant phenotype of triple BCSCs. Taken together, understanding the regulation of BCSCs as well as the potential targeting therapy for these cells is crucial for identifying a novel approach for TNBC therapy.

  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Top

The change in cancer cell phenotype from epithelial to mesenchymal is called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This occurs through the activation of EMT transcription factors, mainly snail family transcriptional repressor 1 (SNAIL), zinc finger E-box homeobox (ZEB), and twist family bHLH transcription factor 1 (TWIST). This process generates new clones of tumor cells that are highly anchor-independent and invasive. EMT is characterized by the loss of E-cadherin and increased expression of N-cadherin and vimentin. Growing evidence indicates that EMT activation is required in the initiation of distant cancer cell metastasis. The EMT cells can invade the tissue surrounding the primary tumor site and penetrate the bloodstream. Moreover, circulating cancer cells express more EMT markers than primary tumor cells. In TNBC, EMT activation induces aggression in cancer cells compared with parental cancer cells.[12] Furthermore, it provides a resistant phenotype to TNBC cells against chemotherapy.[16] Even EMT activation decreases tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) at the tumor sites as well as the immunotherapy response of syngeneic breast cancer mice models.[17] Other studies have reported that TNBC patients with high EMT markers have a significantly poorer prognosis than TNBC patients with low EMT markers.[18] Inhibiting EMT suppresses distant metastasis and increases the response to chemotherapy therapy in TNBC patients. Thus, targeting EMT may be beneficial for TNBC treatment.

  Evading Growth Suppression and Cell Proliferation Top

Defects in cell cycle checkpoint regulators commonly occur in patients with cancer, including breast cancer. In the past 3 years, targeted therapy drugs inhibiting the cell cycle have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib were approved to treat the advanced metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer through cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibition. However, this therapeutic approach elicits a minimal response or no response in TNBC due to molecular regulation of the cell cycle in TNBC subtypes is different from HR+/HER2− breast cancer subtypes.[19] Understanding the regulation of cell cycles, particularly TNBC, may provide a novel approach for suppressing cancer progression and providing patients with a favorable prognosis.

  Potential New Targeted Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Cells Top

Cadherin 11

Cadherin 11 (CDH11) is a type-II cadherin that supports the cell–cell junction through hemophilic binding. It is highly expressed in normal mesenchymal cells. CDH11 is also normally required for the migration of neuroepithelium during normal cerebral development.[20] Interestingly, CDH11 is highly expressed in invasive breast cancer cell lines. Our previous study showed that patients who express high CDH11 levels have a poorer prognosis than patients who express low CDH11 levels in breast cancer, including TNBC.[21] Studies have revealed that CDH11 promotes the progression and distant metastasis of renal cancer and prostate cancer.[22],[23] In lung cancer, CDH11 depletion suppresses resistance to paclitaxel treatment.[24] In TNBC, CDH11 inhibition suppresses proliferation, migration, EMT, CSC phenotype, and spontaneous metastasis.[21],[25] In the previous study, targeting CDH11 with a monospecific antibody suppressed tumorigenesis and metastasisin vivo xenograft mice models.[26]

CDH11 inhibition decreased inflammation in an RA mice model through suppressing the production of interleukin-6 (IL-6), a proinflammatory cytokine.[27] In several cancer types, IL-6 has different roles in terms of regulating the function of immune cells, such as T-cells and dendritic cells (DCs).[28] The blockage of IL-6 suppresses the proliferation and migration of TNBC cells. Targeting IL-6 significantly reduces tumor growth and decreases the thoracic metastasis of TNBC in xenograft mouse models in combination with anti-C-C motif chemokine ligand 5.[29] Notably, the activation of the IL-6 signaling pathway induces EMT and increases the stemness of TNBC cells. Moreover, increasing IL-6 secretion by TNBC cells induces THP-1 cell polarization into M2-like macrophages.[30] This may provide a new mechanism of CDH11 regulation in the TNBC TME. However, the interaction between CDH11 and IL-6 in TNBC is still unclear.


β-catenin is encoded by the catenin beta 1 (CTNNBB1) gene that involves in cell-cell adhesion and gene transcription. When the Wnt ligand binds to its receptor, β-catenin moves from the cytoplasm to the nucleus to activate the Wnt signaling pathway target genes. TNBC cell lines express higher β-catenin levels than the ER+ breast cancer cell line.[31] A high β-catenin expression correlates with the poor disease-free survival of TNBC patients.[32] However, another study revealed a favorable prognosis in TNBC patients with a high expression of β-catenin.[33] The prognostic value of β-catenin in TNBC patients may vary based on its location. The presence of β-catenin in the cytoplasm and nucleus is characteristic of Wnt signaling activation. Sequestering β-catenin in membrane sites inhibits its translocation to the nucleus and suppresses Wnt signaling pathways.[34] Loss of β-catenin in the membrane and cytoplasmic accumulation are significantly more frequent in TNBC.[35] β-catenin inhibition suppresses the stem cell-like phenotype and migration ability of TNBC cells. In anin vivo study, β-catenin knocking down reduced the size of TNBC tumors.[31] Furthermore, growing evidence indicates that β-catenin plays a crucial role in the chemoresistant phenotype regulation of TNBC. A decline in β-catenin expression sensitizes cancer cells to doxorubicin and cisplatin.[31] TNBC cell lines that highly express β-catenin possess a resistant phenotype to paclitaxel.[32]

Patients with non-T-cell-inflamed tumors obtain less benefit or no benefit from immunotherapy treatment for many cancers, including breast cancers. Understanding the mechanism behind non–T-cell-inflamed tumors may improve the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches to such tumors. A study of 31 solid tumor types revealed that the β-catenin signaling pathway was activated in 90% of non-T-cell-inflamed tumors. However, in melanoma, the intrinsic activity of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway induced immune exclusion.[36] The β-catenin overexpression in TNBC patients has been correlated with the high expression of stromal TIL CD8+. However, the β-catenin overexpression also positively associated with preset of regulatory T cell (FOXP3+) in the stromal sites may lead to CD8+ T-cells deactivation in TNBC patients.[37] In another study, the Wnt signaling pathway regulated T-cell activation through programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) modulation. PD-L1 expression is positively correlated with the stemness of TNBC cells. The Wnt signaling pathway inhibition can suppress PD-L1 expression levels.[38] Thus, through targeting cancer cells as well as TMEs, β-catenin may be a potential targeted therapy for TNBC.

Lysine demethylase 5B (KDM5B)

Histone modification is a mechanism for regulating gene transcription. Lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4) demethylation by KDM5B represses the initiation of gene transcription in normal adult cells.[39] In patients with breast cancer, KDM5B is positively correlated to metastasis.[40] Migration ability and EMT initiation are required to initiate distant metastasis in breast cancers, including TNBC. Our previous study revealed that KDM5B inhibition reverses EMT, inhibiting the cell migration and proliferation of breast cancer cell lines, including TNBC cell lines.[40],[41],[42] A decrease in KDM5B suppressed the metastasis and reduced the survival rate of micein vivo models.[41],[42] Enforcing the normal breast cell line to express KDM5B induces it to acquire a cancer-stem-cell-like phenotype, and inhibiting KDM5B in TNBC suppresses cancer-stem-cell-like markers and enhances chemosensitivity.[41]

The presence of DCs at tumor sites is necessary to activate both innate and acquired immune cells against cancer cells. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signaling pathway is the main regulator in DC activation. It detects cancer cytosolic DNA as an activating signal induces type I interferon (IFN) secretion, either autocrine or paracrine, leading to the enhanced antigen presentation ability of DCs.[43] Moreover, type I IFN enhances the cytotoxic effect of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte or natural killer (NK) cells against cancer cells.[44],[45] However, in most cancers, STING is commonly inactivated through an unknown mechanism. In multiple cancer types, KDM5B expression is negatively correlated with STING expression. Promoting STING expression through KDM5 inhibition dramatically increases type I IFN production in a DNA-dependent manner in breast cancer cells.[46] Thus, KDM5B may suppress immune activation through STING regulation in TNBC cells. Targeting KDM5B in TNBC may provide benefits through attenuating the cancer cells and promoting immune-activated TME.

Signal peptide CUB-EGF domain-containing protein 2

Signal peptide CUB-EGF domain-containing protein 2 (SCUBE2) is normally expressed in endothelial cells and nonendothelial cells such as fibroblasts, renal mesangial cells, and normal mammary ductal epithelial cells. Moreover, SCUBE2 is expressed in primary breast cancer cells and has prognostic value. A clinical study showed that patients with breast cancer who are positive for SCUBE2 have a better disease-free survival rate than those negative for SCUBE2.[47] SCUBE2 expression in TNBC cells was significantly downregulated relative to normal ductal cells.[48] This finding indicates that SCUBE2 acts as a crucial tumor suppressor in patients with breast cancer, such as TNBC. Forcing SCUBE2 expression in noninvasive and invasive breast cancer cell lines inhibited cell proliferation and tumor growthin vitro and nude mice models, respectively.[47],[49] A study on TNBC cells revealed that SCUBE2 expression reversed the transforming growth factor-beta-induced EMT to MET through an increase in E-cadherin-containing adherent junctions.[50] Conversely, the SCUBE2 was found higher in tumor sphere cells than those adherent cells in TNBC. Enforcing the SCUBE2 expression level in TNBC stem cells increases the cell motility in vitro. Overexpression SCUBE2 in TNBC stem cells enhanced metastasis by Notch signaling pathway activationin vivo study.[51] These contradictions may suggest the SCUBE2 act as either tumor suppressor or oncogene based on which cells are used. Further studies are needed to investigate the correlation of SCUBE2 expression level for each breast cancer subtypes since breast cancer is not a single disease. Each subtype exhibit distinct cell molecular pathways and clinical characteristic. Thein vitro study need to explore the mechanism of SCUBE2 in the TNBC stem cells versus those non-CSCs to confirm the SCUBE2 acts as a tumor suppressor gene or oncogene.


According to advanced therapeutic study for the past 3 years on patients with advanced metastatic HR+/HER2 − breast cancer through targeting CDK4/6, TNBC patients exhibited only a negligible response no response to this therapeutic approach. A study on TNBC revealed several CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance mechanisms. The overexpression of CDK2-and retinoblastoma-deficient (Rb-) phenotypes leading to CDK4/6 inhibition is insufficient to induce cell cycle arrest at the G1/G0 phase.[52] Failure of the CDK4/6 inhibition approach suppresses the TNBC cell cycle, leading to the targeting of CDK2, with promising results obtained. Using small-compound CDK2 inhibitor drugs to decrease CDK2 expression significantly suppressed TNBC cell proliferation and induced cell arrest.[53] CDK2 inhibition using this small compound drug suppressed tumor growth, with no mortality, in xenograft mouse models.[53] Combining CDK2 inhibition and the chemotherapy agent eribulin suppresses TNBC growthin vitro and in vivo.[54]

In human diseases such as cancers, unrepaired DNA damage promotes the release of DNA into cytoplasmic sites and activates the STING signaling pathway. The STING signaling pathway increases type I IFN, which leads to immune system activation in many cancers, including breast cancer.[43] CDK2 is a regulatory machine in the G1-S and S phases of the cell cycle. Most of gene targets of CDK2 pathways are regulator proteins for DNA replication and DNA damage repair. Knocking down CDK2 induces DNA damage through inhibiting DNA damage repair in breast cancers, including TNBC.[55],[56] Through this mechanism, CDK2 may have a regulatory role in the immune status of TNBC patients.

  Tumor Microenvironment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Top

The noncancerous surrounding of tumor sites, including the fibroblast, immune cells, and cells constituting blood vessels, is called the TME. Moreover, all proteins produced by cancer cells and noncancerous cells in tumors supporting cancer cell progression constitute the TME.[57] Cancer initiation, oncogene activation, and tumor suppressor inactivation transform normal cells into malignant cancerous cells.[58] Tumor tissue and metastasis cannot be accomplished by cancer cells alone. Cancer cells recruit stromal cells surrounding cancer cells through the secretion of cytokines and chemokines, and through other factors.[59] Through this mechanism, an environment is created comprising noncancerous cells that produce tumor growth signals and intermediate metabolites and promote metastasis.[58] This collaborative work between cancer cells and the TME accelerates the proliferation rate and metastasis capability. Moreover, TMEs determine response to therapy, such as primary tumor eradication, relapse, resistance, or metastasis to distant organs.[60] The aggressiveness of TNBC is not only caused by the high heterogeneity of the cancer cell but also TMEs. TNBC has high TIL, tumor-associated macrophage (TAM), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) than less aggressive luminal subtypes.[61] TILs and TAM cell numbers determine whether patients benefit from advanced immune therapy.[62] In TNBC, TILs are significantly correlated with chemotherapy response as well as pCR after NAC.

  Angiogenesis Top

New capillary formation from preexisting vasculature, termed angiogenesis, is crucial in physiological functions, including the healing of injured tissue. In cancer tissue, blood vessels are essential for nourishment and the waste metabolite disposal of cancer cells. The high proliferation of cancer cells leads to the rapid growth of tumor tissues without rapid angiogenesis lead to the generating of a hypoxic area at the tumor's center. In supporting further tumor growth, and the cancer cells secrete angiogenic factors as well as proteases. It initiates the degradation of the basalis membrane of blood vessels and promotes the movement and growth of endothelial cells to generate neovascularization of the hypoxic area of tumor tissues. This neovascularization allows the oxygen and nutrient supply to reach the rapidly proliferating cancer cells to promote tumor growth and support the distant organ metastasis of cancer cells.[63] The discovery of angiogenesis inhibitors provided a new therapeutic approach against cancers. Thousands of cancer patients received angiogenesis inhibitor therapy but did not have long-term benefits.[64],[65] Conversely, antiangiogenesis therapy suppressed the neovascularization of tumor tissue, inducing the rapid growth of tumors to develop a more hypoxic area. In clonal selection in the hypoxic area, viable cancer cells show resistance to hypoxic conditions as well as chemotherapy and possess a cancer-stem-cell-like phenotype.[66] This mechanism may have led to the lack of satisfactory results from the single therapeutic approach of antiangiogenesis in patients with cancer. Targeting angiogenesis and cancer-stem-cell-like cells may improve the response and long-term survival of patients with cancer.

The microvascular density of breast cancer tissue holds prognostic value in breast cancer patients. Notably, TNBCs have higher microvascular density than non-TNBCs. TNBC patients have significantly higher expression of VEGF and have a shorter survival time than non-TNBC breast cancer patients.[67] Small interfering RNA mediated inhibition of VEGF suppressed migration and invasionin vitro as well as tumor growth in an orthotopic mouse model of TNBC. However, a few phase III clinical trials of anti-VEGF antibody therapy of bevacizumab and ramucirumab failed to reveal an improved survival rate of TNBC patients.[68] Another study revealed that antiangiogenic agents increase CSCs through the generation of a hypoxic area in TNBC. The hypoxic condition activates a Wnt signaling pathway mediated by HIF1α, HIF2α, Akt, and β-catenin to induce cancer stemness. This mechanism may limit the efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs as a single therapy against TNBC.[69] Combination therapy targeting angiogenesis and cancer-stem-cell-like cells may provide a better prognosis and survival rate for TNBC patients.

  Targeting Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1 to Activate Immune Cells Top

Innate and adaptive immune cells are required to eradicate cancer cells. The immune cells recognize abnormal cells as targets. During the clonal selection of tumor progression, cancer cells improve their survival ability through evading immune cell surveillance. The cancer cells develop the immune checkpoint blockade to drive immune anticancer cells to suppress immunity, creating a tumor growth-promoting microenvironment. The most advanced immune checkpoint blockade studied is PD1/PD-L1 protein-protein interaction. PD1 is a membrane receptor protein expressed by T-cells and NK cells. PD-L1 is expressed by cancer cells as well as noncancerous tumor cells, including cancer-associated fibroblasts, T regulatory cells, myeloid cells, and endothelial cells. An interaction of PD-L1 with PD1 inhibits the T-cell activation signal as well as NK cell activation. Advances in immune therapy targeting PD-L1 improved the prognosis of patients with melanoma, nonsmall-cell lung cancer, and clear-cell kidney carcinoma; however, breast cancer was the least responsive cancer to this treatment approach.[70] In terms of improving the treatment response of breast cancer to immunotherapy, growing evidence has shown that TNBC is the breast cancer subtype with the best response to immunotherapy. TNBC patients have higher TIL expression than non-TNBC patients.[61] Moreover, they have higher PD-L1 expression than non-TNBC patients.[71] Notably, PD-L1 expression was positively and significantly correlated with the TIL number in breast cancer tissues.[72] PD-L1 expression has prognostic value for patients with stage I–III TNBC.[73] Furthermore, the pCR of TNBC patients is correlated to PD-L1 expression.[74] These findings suggest the TNBC patients are the best candidate for immunotherapy approaches. By 2019, the FDA approved the immunotherapy drug atezolizumab that targets PD-L1 as a first targeted therapy to treat advanced TNBC. In phase 3 clinical trial, the median progression-free survival rate of patients given atezolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel was significantly higher than that of patients given a placebo with nab-paclitaxel (7.2 months vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.002). Moreover, atezolizumab increased the median progression-free survival of patients with PD-L1 positive tumors (7.5 months in the atezolizumab group vs. 5 months in the control group, P < 0.001). This finding indicates that targeting PD-L1 through atezolizumab drug therapy is beneficial for patients with advanced TNBC.[75]

  Tumor-Associated Macrophages Top

TAMs defined as macrophage infiltrating tumor tissue or populated in the microenvironment of solid tumors. These cells were recruited and activated by signals in the tumor microenvironment. As part of tumor microenvironments, TAMs exhibit an important role in tumor progression and metastasis. After activated in the tumor microenvironment, macrophage divided into classical-activated macrophages (M1) and alternative-activated macrophages (M2). The M1 induce inflammation in response to eliminates pathogens and tumor cells. While the most macrophages profoundly polarize into M2 macrophages exhibit immune-suppressive phenotypes and promote tumor progression. The M2 secretes cytokines such as IL-4, IL-3, IL-6, CCL7, CCL8, CCL9, CCL18, and CXCL12, which are attenuate the immune response against tumor cells.[76]

The TNBC tissue patients markedly have higher infiltrating of macrophages relative to non-TNBC tissue patients.[77] Infiltrating TAMs exhibit the worst prognostic factor for TNBC patients. A large number of infiltrating TAMs in the tumor site significantly associated with a higher risk of metastasis, the lower rate of disease-free survival, and overall survival relative to lesser number infiltrating TAMs of TNBC patients.[78] Further, the TNBC had significantly higher M2 TAMs than M1 TAMs.[79] In TNBC, TAMs induce tumor growth and progression by secretion of immune inhibitory cytokines, reduce functional effector of TILs, and promoting the regulatory T cell.[80] Drive the M2 TAMs to M1 TAMs may activate the immune microenvironment against TNBC cells.

  Potential Small Compound Drugs Targeting Tumor Cells and the Tumor Microenvironment Top

Traditional herbal medicines have been widely used to cure diseases such as cancers. An increase in cancer detection methods and therapies has led to an increase in anticancer drug development. This led to the transition from natural herbal extracts to synthetic drug production on a large scale by pharmaceutical manufacturers. However, recently, a tendency to return to natural herbal medicine has emerged, which has promoted the intense study of small natural compounds derived from herbs to cure all cancers, including TNBC. Herein, we discuss a few natural, small compounds with anticancer properties against TNBC.


Ovatodiolide is a biologically active macrocyclic diterpenoid extracted from Anisomeles indica. In our previous study, ovatodiolide treatment could sensitize TNBC cell lines to doxorubicin. Also, this small compound inhibits stem-cell-like phenotypes in TNBC cells.[81] PD-L1 expression in the cancer cells induces immune evasion by binding with an inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor, PD-1 protein, which is expressed on activated T-cells. Interestingly, the CSCs (ALDH+/CD44+) are profoundly increased PD-L1 expression levels relative to non-CSCs (ALDH+/CD44+) in TNBC cells.[38] Insight the Wnt signaling pathways inhibition attenuates the cancer stemness,[21] selective Wnt inhibitors decreased the PD-L1 expression in TNBC cells.[38] In renal cancer, ovatodiolide suppresses cancer cell viability, invasion, migration, and survivalin vitro studies as well as tumorigenicityin vivo studies through targeting β-catenin.[82] Ovatodiolide treatment attenuates the malignancy of oral cancer through decreased exosomal Mir-21/STAT3/β-catenin cargo.[83] Our previous study demonstrated that Ovatodiolide treatment suppresses the canonical Wnt signaling pathway that attenuates CSC-like phenotypes in hepatocellular carcinoma.[84] Taken together, the Ovatodiolide may provide a new promising small compound drug suppress the CSCs and activates the immune cells against TNBC through Wnt/PD-L1 axis. However, the mechanism of ovatodiolide regulates the Wnt signaling pathway and PD-L1 expression level in TNBC are remaining unclear. In other studies have shown that ovatodiolide modulates colon cancer TMEs through inhibiting M2 TAM generationin vitro andin vivo studies, provide another possible mechanism of ovatodiolide against the TNBC cells.[85] Targeting CSCs, PD-L1, and M2 TAM through ovatodiolide treatment may provide improved responses and prognoses for TNBC patients. However, the effect of this small compound on the TME of TNBC is unclear, with further study required.


Antrocin (AC) is a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from Antrodia cinnamomea.[86] In prostate cancer cells, AC treatment sensitizes cells to radiotherapy through PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathway suppression. Further, the AC also attenuates the type 1 insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R)-mediated induction of β-catenin.[87] However, in TNBC, AC treatment inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis through Akt/mTOR signaling pathway inhibition.[88] Furthermore, our previous study showed that AC synergistically enhanced the efficacy of paclitaxel against TNBCin vitro and in vivo. This study also revealed AC suppresses tumorigenicity and the stem-cell-like phenotype of TNBC cells through β-catenin/Notch1/Akt signaling pathways inhibition.[86] As described previously, the CSCs exhibit higher PD-L1 expression levels than non-CSCs in TNBC. The Wnt signaling pathway inhibition decreased both self-renewal ability and PD-L1 expression levels on CSCs.[38] Although the effect of AC to PD-L1 expression level is remaining unclear; currently, studies support the possibility of AC treatment on TNBC suppress the PD-L1 expression in CSCs through Wnt pathway inhibition. Moreover, a recent study revealed the Notch, MAPK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT inhibitors treatment significantly decrease PD-L1 on CSCs of TNBC.[89] This adds the possible mechanism of AC suppress the PD-L1 expression level on BCSCs via Notch/Akt signaling inhibitions.


Pterostilbene, a natural stilbene isolated from blueberries, has anticancer activity against TNBC.[90] Our previous studies have revealed that this natural small compound inhibits EMT in TNBC cells through upregulating E-cadherin and downregulating Snail, ZEB1, vimentin, and Slug. Consistently,in vivo results have shown that pterostilbene also inhibits tumor growth and metastasis.[91] In breast tumor, which is arising from more mesenchymal breast carcinoma cell lines expressed a low level of MHC class I, and high levels of PD-L1. Moreover, the stromal tumor invaded by immune suppressor cells regulatory T-cells, and M2 (protumor) macrophages, while the CD8+ T cells are exhausted.[17] Reversing the EMT to MET by pterostilbene may promote the immune-activating tumor microenvironment in TNBC. This approach may improve the TNBC patients to the immunotherapy approach. Furthermore, coculturing TNBC cell lines with M2 TAMs increase CSC (CD44+/CD24−) population as well as cancer cell invasion and migration ability. Pterostilbene treatment suppresses the CSC population in TNBC cells cocultured with M2 TAMs and inhibits tumorigenicity and metastasis in mouse models.[90]

  Conclusion Top

The heterogeneity of cancer cells supported by a protumorigenic microenvironment induces TNBC to exhibit aggressive clinical characteristics, which are difficult to treat [Figure 1]. The current standard of chemotherapy confers only a low pCR in TNBC patients. The stemness, EMT, evasion of growth suppression, angiogenesis, and immune cells may provide a mechanism for cancer cell and TME interaction in TNBC patients. The dual targeting of cancer cells and inhibiting protumorigenic TMEs could provide improved treatment responses and survival in TNBC patients. Extensive studies are required to determine promising targeted therapy against TNBC.
Figure 1: Potential targeted therapy, including potential natural small compounds, for triple-negative breast cancer. cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell proliferation, and evasion of growth suppression lead to triple-negative breast cancer cell heterogeneity. Neovascularization through angiogenesis and immune cell suppression create a protumorigenic tumor microenvironment. Crosstalk between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment are required for tumor initiation, progression, drug resistance, relapse, as well as distant metastasis. Herein, we highlight several oncogenes (red) and one tumor suppressor gene (blue) that regulate cancer cell heterogeneity as well as the tumor microenvironment as a potential new approach to triple-negative breast cancer treatment. On the basis of our previously study, ovatodiolide, pterostilbene, and antrocin are potential natural small compounds with anticancer properties against triple-negative breast cancer, achieved through targeting cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment

Click here to view


The authors thank Ting-Yi Huang and all research assistants of the Translational Research Laboratory and Core Facility Center, Taipei Medical University—Shuang Ho Hospital for their assistance with the flow cytometry, molecular and cell-based assays. The author also thanks the CRISPR Gene Targeting Core Lab at Taipei Medical University in Taiwan for providing technical support. The authors would like to acknowledge the Taipei Medical University for technical support of professional English proofreading and editing services.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan: Tsu-Yi Chao (MOST105-2314-B038-080 and MOST 108-2314-B-038-051-MY3). This work was also supported by grant from the Taipei Medical University-National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Joint Research Program (TMU-NTUST-103-03) provided to Chi-Tai Yeh.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

van Roozendaal LM, Smit LH, Duijsens GH, de Vries B, Siesling S, Lobbes MB, et al. Risk of regional recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients: A Dutch cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016;156:465-72.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kim C, Gao R, Sei E, Brandt R, Hartman J, Hatschek T, et al. Chemoresistance evolution in triple-negative breast cancer delineated by single-cell sequencing. Cell 2018;173:879-93.e13.  Back to cited text no. 2
Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1275-81.  Back to cited text no. 3
Balko JM, Schwarz LJ, Luo N, Estrada MV, Giltnane JM, Dávila-González D, et al. Triple-negative breast cancers with amplification of JAK2 at the 9p24 locus demonstrate JAK2-specific dependence. Sci Transl Med 2016;8:334ra53.  Back to cited text no. 4
Gay L, Baker AM, Graham TA. Tumour cell heterogeneity. F1000Res 2016;5:1-14.  Back to cited text no. 5
Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:81-94.  Back to cited text no. 6
Skums P, Tsyvina V, Zelikovsky A. Inference of clonal selection in cancer populations using single-cell sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2019;35:i398-407.  Back to cited text no. 7
Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:3983-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
Tirino V, Desiderio V, Paino F, De Rosa A, Papaccio F, La Noce M, et al. Cancer stem cells in solid tumors: An overview and new approaches for their isolation and characterization. FASEB J 2013;27:13-24.  Back to cited text no. 9
Park SY, Choi JH, Nam JS. Targeting cancer stem cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:965.  Back to cited text no. 10
Phi LT, Sari IN, Yang YG, Lee SH, Jun N, Kim KS, et al. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in drug resistance and their therapeutic implications in cancer treatment. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:5416923.  Back to cited text no. 11
Floor S, van Staveren WC, Larsimont D, Dumont JE, Maenhaut C. Cancer cells in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumor-propagating-cancer stem cells: Distinct, overlapping or same populations. Oncogene 2011;30:4609-21.  Back to cited text no. 12
Chae YC, Kim JH. Cancer stem cell metabolism: Target for cancer therapy. BMB Rep 2018;51:319-26.  Back to cited text no. 13
Snyder V, Reed-Newman TC, Arnold L, Thomas SM, Anant S. Cancer stem cell metabolism and potential therapeutic targets. Front Oncol 2018;8:203.  Back to cited text no. 14
Min LK, Giltnane JM, Balko JM, Schwarz LJ, Guerrero-Zotano AL, Hutchinson KE, et al. MYC and MCL1 cooperatively promote chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells via regulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab 2017;26:633-47.e7.  Back to cited text no. 15
Fedele M, Cerchia L, Chiappetta G. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer: Focus on basal-like carcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2017;9:134.  Back to cited text no. 16
Dongre A, Rashidian M, Reinhardt F, Bagnato A, Keckesova Z, Ploegh HL, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to immunosuppression in breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 2017;77:3982-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
Jang MH, Kim HJ, Kim EJ, Chung YR, Park SY. Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related markers in triple-negative breast cancer: ZEB1 as a potential biomarker for poor clinical outcome. Hum Pathol 2015;46:1267-74.  Back to cited text no. 18
Finn RS, Dering J, Conklin D, Kalous O, Cohen DJ, Desai AJ, et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res 2009;11:R77.  Back to cited text no. 19
Schulte JD, Srikanth M, Das S, Zhang J, Lathia JD, Yin L, et al. Cadherin-11 regulates motility in normal cortical neural precursors and glioblastoma. PLoS One 2013;8:e70962.  Back to cited text no. 20
Satriyo P, Bamodu O, Chen JH, Aryandono T, Haryana S, Yeh CT, et al. Cadherin 11 inhibition downregulates β-catenin, deactivates the canonical Wnt signalling pathway and suppresses the cancer stem cell-like phenotype of triple negative breast cancer. J Clin Med 2019;8:148.  Back to cited text no. 21
Chu K, Cheng CJ, Ye X, Lee YC, Zurita AJ, Chen DT, et al. Cadherin-11 promotes the metastasis of prostate cancer cells to bone. Mol Cancer Res 2008;6:1259-67.  Back to cited text no. 22
Satcher RL, Pan T, Cheng CJ, Lee YC, Lin SC, Yu G, et al. Cadherin-11 in renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis. PLoS One 2014;9:e89880.  Back to cited text no. 23
Yoon S, Choi JH, Kim SJ, Lee EJ, Shah M, Choi S, et al. EPHB6 mutation induces cell adhesion-mediated paclitaxel resistance via EPHA2 and CDH11 expression. Exp Mol Med 2019;51:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 24
Li Y, Chao F, Huang B, Liu D, Kim J, Huang S. HOXC8 promotes breast tumorigenesis by transcriptionally facilitating cadherin-11 expression. Oncotarget 2014;5:2596-607.  Back to cited text no. 25
Chen JH, Huang WC, Bamodu OA, Chang PM, Chao TY, Huang TH. Monospecific antibody targeting of CDH11 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and represses cancer stem cell-like phenotype by up-regulating miR-335 in metastatic breast cancer,in vitro and in vivo. BMC Cancer 2019;19:634.  Back to cited text no. 26
Chang SK, Noss EH, Chen M, Gu Z, Townsend K, Grenha R, et al. Cadherin-11 regulates fibroblast inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:8402-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
Tsukamoto H, Fujieda K, Senju S, Ikeda T, Oshiumi H, Nishimura Y. Immune-suppressive effects of interleukin-6 on T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Sci 2018;109:523-30.  Back to cited text no. 28
Jin K, Pandey NB, Popel AS. Simultaneous blockade of IL-6 and CCL5 signaling for synergistic inhibition of triple-negative breast cancer growth and metastasis. Breast Cancer Res 2018;20:54.  Back to cited text no. 29
Weng YS, Tseng HY, Chen YA, Shen PC, Al Haq AT, Chen LM, et al. MCT-1/miR-34a/IL-6/IL-6R signaling axis promotes EMT progression, cancer stemness and M2 macrophage polarization in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer 2019;18:42.  Back to cited text no. 30
Xu J, Prosperi JR, Choudhury N, Olopade OI, Goss KH. B-catenin is required for the tumorigenic behavior of triple-negative breast cancer cells. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117097.  Back to cited text no. 31
Shen H, Yan W, Yuan J, Wang Z, Wang C. Nek2B activates the Wnt pathway and promotes triple-negative breast cancer chemothezrapy-resistance by stabilizing β-catenin. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019;38:243.  Back to cited text no. 32
Shen T, Zhang K, Siegal GP, Wei S. Prognostic value of E-cadherin and β-catenin in triple-negative breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2016;146:603-10.  Back to cited text no. 33
MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling components: Mechanisms and diseases. Dev Cell 2019;17:9-26.  Back to cited text no. 34
Gudtskova TN, Vashchenko LN, Karnaukhov NS, Kvarchiya MV, Bosenko ES, Saforyan NS, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of Cyclin D1 and β-Catenin expression in subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019;37: e12553.  Back to cited text no. 35
Luke JJ, Bao R, Sweis RF, Spranger S, Gajewski TF. WNT/b-catenin pathway activation correlates with immune exclusion across human cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25:3074-83.  Back to cited text no. 36
Ma X, Zhao X, Yan W, Yang J, Zhao X, Zhang H, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with β-catenin overexpression in breast cancer. Cancer Biomarkers 2018;21:639-50.  Back to cited text no. 37
Castagnoli L, Cancila V, Cordoba-Romero SL, Faraci S, Talarico G, Belmonte B, et al. WNT signaling modulates PD-L1 expression in the stem cell compartment of triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2019;38:4047-60.  Back to cited text no. 38
Zheng YC, Chang J, Wang LC, Ren HM, Pang JR, Liu HM. Lysine demethylase 5B (KDM5B): A potential anti-cancer drug target. Eur J Med Chem 2019;161:131-40.  Back to cited text no. 39
Zhang ZG, Zhang HS, Sun HL, Liu HY, Liu MY, Zhou Z. KDM5B promotes breast cancer cell proliferation and migration via AMPK-mediated lipid metabolism reprogramming. Exp Cell Res 2019;379:182-90.  Back to cited text no. 40
Bamodu OA, Huang WC, Lee WH, Wu A, Wang LS, Hsiao M, et al. Aberrant KDM5B expression promotes aggressive breast cancer through MALAT1 overexpression and downregulation of hsa-miR-448. BMC Cancer 2016;16:160.  Back to cited text no. 41
Montano MM, Yeh IJ, Chen Y, Hernandez C, Kiselar JG, de la Fuente M, et al. Inhibition of the histone demethylase, KDM5B, directly induces re-expression of tumor suppressor protein HEXIM1 in cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res 2019;21:138.  Back to cited text no. 42
Vargas TR, Benoit-Lizon I, Apetoh L. Rationale for STING-targeted cancer immunotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2017;75:86.  Back to cited text no. 43
Li A, Yi M, Qin S, Song Y, Chu Q, Wu K. Activating cGAS-STING pathway for the optimal effect of cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol 2019;12:35.  Back to cited text no. 44
Müller L, Aigner P, Stoiber D. Type I Interferons and Natural Killer Cell Regulation in Cancer. Front Immunol 2017;8:304.  Back to cited text no. 45
Wu L, Cao J, Cai WL, Lang SM, Horton JR, Jansen DJ, et al. KDM5 histone demethylases repress immune response via suppression of STING. PLoS Biol 2018;16:e2006134.  Back to cited text no. 46
Lin YC, Chen CC, Cheng CJ, Yang RB. Domain and functional analysis of a novel breast tumor suppressor protein, SCUBE2. J Biol Chem 2011;286:27039-47.  Back to cited text no. 47
Komatsu M, Yoshimaru T, Matsuo T, Kiyotani K, Miyoshi Y, Tanahashi T, et al. Molecular features of triple negative breast cancer cells by genome-wide gene expression profiling analysis. Int J Oncol 2013;42:478-506.  Back to cited text no. 48
Cheng CJ, Lin YC, Tsai MT, Chen CS, Hsieh MC, Chen CL, et al. SCUBE2 suppresses breast tumor cell proliferation and confers a favorable prognosis in invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2009;69:3634-41.  Back to cited text no. 49
Lin YC, Lee YC, Li LH, Cheng CJ, Yang RB. Tumor suppressor SCUBE2 inhibits breast-cancer cell migration and invasion through the reversal of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Sci 2014;127:85-100.  Back to cited text no. 50
Chen JH, Kuo KT, Bamodu OA, Lin YC, Yang RB, Yeh CT, et al. Upregulated SCUBE2 expression in breast cancer stem cells enhances triple negative breast cancer aggression through modulation of notch signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Exp Cell Res 2018;370:444-53.  Back to cited text no. 51
Pernas S, Tolaney SM, Winer EP, Goel S. CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: Current practice and future directions. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2018;10:1758835918786451.  Back to cited text no. 52
Singh U, Chashoo G, Khan SU, Mahajan P, Nargotra A, Mahajan G, et al. Design of novel 3-pyrimidinylazaindole CDK2/9 inhibitors with potentin vitro andin vivo antitumor efficacy in a triple-negative breast cancer model. J Med Chem 2017;60:9470-89.  Back to cited text no. 53
Rao SS, Stoehr J, Dokic D, Wan L, Decker JT, Konopka K, et al. Synergistic effect of eribulin and CDK inhibition for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:83925-39.  Back to cited text no. 54
Chen X, Low KH, Alexander A, Jiang Y, Karakas C, Hess KR, et al. Cyclin E overexpression sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer to wee1 kinase inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:6594-610.  Back to cited text no. 55
Deans AJ, Khanna KK, McNees CJ, Mercurio C, Heierhorst J, McArthur GA. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 functions in normal DNA repair and is a therapeutic target in BRCA1-deficient cancers. Cancer Res 2006;66:8219-26.  Back to cited text no. 56
Wang M, Zhao J, Zhang L, Wei F, Lian Y, Wu Y, et al. Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis. J Cancer 2017;8:761-73.  Back to cited text no. 57
Yuan Y, Jiang YC, Sun CK, Chen QM. Role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor progression and the clinical applications (Review). Oncol Rep 2016;35:2499-515.  Back to cited text no. 58
Hinshaw DC, Shevde LA. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res 2019;79:4557-66.  Back to cited text no. 59
Shen M, Kang Y. Complex interplay between tumor microenvironment and cancer therapy. Front Med 2018;12:426-39.  Back to cited text no. 60
Yu T, Di G. Role of tumor microenvironment in triple-negative breast cancer and its prognostic significance. Chin J Cancer Res 2017;29:237-52.  Back to cited text no. 61
Bareche Y, Buisseret L, Gruosso T, Girard E, Venet D, Dupont F, et al. Unraveling triple-negative breast cancer tumor microenvironment heterogeneity: Towards an optimized treatment approach. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020;112:708-19.  Back to cited text no. 62
Tonini T, Rossi F, Claudio PP. Molecular basis of angiogenesis and cancer. Oncogene 2003;22:6549-56.  Back to cited text no. 63
Nishida N, Yano H, Nishida T, Kamura T, Kojiro M. Angiogenesis in cancer. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2006;2:213-9.  Back to cited text no. 64
Rajabi M, Mousa SA. The role of angiogenesis in cancer treatment. Biomedicines 2017;5:34.  Back to cited text no. 65
Xiang L, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors promote breast cancer stem cell specification and maintenance in response to hypoxia or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Adv Cancer Res 2019;141:175-212.  Back to cited text no. 66
Ribatti D, Nico B, Ruggieri S, Tamma R, Simone G, Mangia A. Angiogenesis and antiangiogenesis in triple-negative breast cancer. Transl Oncol 2016;9:453-7.  Back to cited text no. 67
Zhao Z, Li Y, Shukla R, Liu H, Jain A, Barve A, et al. Development of a biocompatible copolymer nanocomplex to deliver VEGF siRNA for triple negative breast cancer. Theranostics 2019;9:4508-24.  Back to cited text no. 68
Santos SJ, Kakarala P, Heath A, Clouthier S, Wicha MS. Abstract 3336: Anti-angiogenic agents increase breast cancer stem cells via generation of tumor hypoxia. Cancer Res 2011;71:3336.  Back to cited text no. 69
Planes-Laine G, Rochigneux P, Bertucci F, Chrétien AS, Viens P, Sabatier R, et al. PD-1/PD-L1 targeting in breast cancer: The first clinical evidences are emerging. A literature review. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:1033.  Back to cited text no. 70
Mittendorf EA, Philips AV, Meric-Bernstam F, Qiao N, Wu Y, Harrington S, et al. PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2014;2:361-70.  Back to cited text no. 71
Kitano A, Ono M, Yoshida M, Noguchi E, Shimomura A, Shimoi T, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with higher expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in early breast cancer. ESMO Open 2017;2:e000150.  Back to cited text no. 72
Dieci M, Orvieto E, Tsvetkova V, Griguolo G, Miglietta F, Bonaguro S, et al. Abstract P4-08-04: PD-L1 expression and prognosis in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): An analysis of 265 patients (PTS) treated with standard therapy for stage I-III disease. Cancer Res 2019;79:P4-08-04.  Back to cited text no. 73
Cerbelli B, Pernazza A, Botticelli A, Fortunato L, Monti M, Sciattella P, et al. PD-L1 expression in TNBC: A predictive biomarker of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1750925.  Back to cited text no. 74
Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2108-21.  Back to cited text no. 75
Lin Y, Xu J, Lan H. Tumor-associated macrophages in tumor metastasis: Biological roles and clinical therapeutic applications. J Hematol Oncol 2019;12:76.  Back to cited text no. 76
Lu X, Yang R, Zhang L, Xi Y, Zhao J, Wang F, et al. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor mediates the recruitment of macrophages in triple negative breast cancer. Int J Biol Sci 2019;15:2859-71.  Back to cited text no. 77
Yuan ZY, Luo RZ, Peng RJ, Wang SS, Xue C. High infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages in triple-negative breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis. Onco Targets Ther 2014;7:1475-80.  Back to cited text no. 78
Juncker-Jensen A, Stavrou N, Padmanabhan R, Parnell E, Kuo J, Leones E, et al. Abstract 1175: A pro-tumorigenic mechanism of M2 tumor-associated macrophages in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019;79:1175.  Back to cited text no. 79
Santoni M, Romagnoli E, Saladino T, Foghini L, Guarino S, Capponi M, et al. Triple negative breast cancer: Key role of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in regulating the activity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2018;1869:78-84.  Back to cited text no. 80
Bamodu OA, Huang WC, Tzeng DT, Wu A, Wang LS, Yeh CT, et al. Ovatodiolide sensitizes aggressive breast cancer cells to doxorubicin, eliminates their cancer stem cell-like phenotype, and reduces doxorubicin-associated toxicity. Cancer Lett 2015;364:125-34.  Back to cited text no. 81
Ho JY, Hsu RJ, Wu CL, Chang WL, Cha TL, Yu DS, et al. Ovatodiolide targets β -catenin signaling in suppressing tumorigenesis and overcoming drug resistance in renal cell carcinoma. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2013;2013:161628.  Back to cited text no. 82
Chen JH, Wu AT, Bamodu OA, Yadav VK, Chao TY, Tzeng YM, et al. Ovatodiolide suppresses oral cancer malignancy by down-regulating exosomal Mir-21/STAT3/β-catenin cargo and preventing oncogenic transformation of normal gingival fibroblasts. Cancers (Basel) 2019;12:56.  Back to cited text no. 83
Liu M, Bamodu OA, Kuo KT, Lee WH, Lin YK, Wu AT, et al. Down regulation of cancer stemness by novel diterpenoid ovatodiolide inhibits hepatic cancer stem cell-like traits by repressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Am J Chin Med 2018;46:891-910.  Back to cited text no. 84
Huang YJ, Yang CK, Wei PL, Huynh TT, Whang-Peng J, Meng TC, et al. Ovatodiolide suppresses colon tumorigenesis and prevents polarization of M2 tumor-associated macrophages through YAP oncogenic pathways. J Hematol Oncol 2017;10:60.  Back to cited text no. 85
Chen JH, Wu AT, Tzeng DT, Huang CC, Tzeng YM, Chao TY. Antrocin, a bioactive component from Antrodia cinnamomea, suppresses breast carcinogenesis and stemness via down regulation of β-catenin/Notch1/Akt signaling. Phytomedicine 2019;52:70-8.  Back to cited text no. 86
Chen YA, Tzeng DT, Huang YP, Lin CJ, Lo UG, Wu CL, et al. Antrocin sensitizes prostate cancer cells to radiotherapy through Inhibiting PI3K/AKT and MAPK Signaling Pathways. Cancers (Basel) 2018;11:34.  Back to cited text no. 87
Rao YK, Wu AT, Geethangili M, Huang MT, Chao WJ, Wu CH, et al. Identification of antrocin from Antrodia camphorata as a selective and novel class of small molecule inhibitor of Akt/mTOR signaling in metastatic breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2011;24:238-45.  Back to cited text no. 88
Mansour FA, Al-Mazrou A, Al-Mohanna F, Al-Alwan M, Ghebeh H. PD-L1 is overexpressed on breast cancer stem cells through notch3/mTOR axis. Oncoimmunology 2020;9:1729299.  Back to cited text no. 89
Mak KK, Wu AT, Lee WH, Chang TC, Chiou JF, Wang LS, et al. Pterostilbene, a bioactive component of blueberries, suppresses the generation of breast cancer stem cells within tumor microenvironment and metastasis via modulating NF-κB/microRNA 448 circuit. Mol Nutr Food Res 2013;57:1123-34.  Back to cited text no. 90
Su CM, Lee WH, Wu AT, Lin YK, Wang LS, Wu CH, et al. Pterostilbene inhibits triple-negative breast cancer metastasis via inducing microRNA-205 expression and negatively modulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. J Nutr Biochem 2015;26:675-85.  Back to cited text no. 91


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Tumor Cell Heter...
Cancer Stem Cells
Evading Growth S...
Potential New Ta...
Tumor Microenvir...
Targeting Progra...
Potential Small ...
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded156    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal