|
| |
 |
|
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2020 | Volume
: 7
| Issue : 3 | Page : 111-115 |
|
Efficacy and safety of uracil-tegafur in patients with recurrent or metastatic thymic carcinoma
Shih- Yu Huang, Cheng- Hua Huang, Harvey Yu-Li Su, Yen- Hao Chen, Tai- Jan Chiu, Yen- Yang Chen
Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taiwan
| Date of Submission | 15-Mar-2020 |
| Date of Decision | 05-Apr-2020 |
| Date of Acceptance | 20-Apr-2020 |
| Date of Web Publication | 1-Sep-2020 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Yen- Yang Chen
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung City 833
Taiwan
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/JCRP.JCRP_11_20
Background: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare but aggressive thymic epithelial neoplasm, with lymphoepithelioma-like histological features resembling nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Epstein–Barr virus is a known etiology of various tumors, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, in Asian patients. These patients have a significant response to cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination chemotherapy. Interestingly, this regimen seems to be effective for TC s resembling nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Currently, the standard second-line therapy for advanced TC is uncertain. The use of uracil-tegafur (UFT), a combination of uracil and 5-FU prodrug, has not been reported in literature. We analyzed the effectiveness and toxicity of UFT as an optional regimen for recurrent or metastatic TC. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients verified to have recurrent or metastatic TC and who were treated with UFT between 2017 and 2019 in our hospital. All patients were treated with UFT until disease progression, the patients could no longer tolerate the treatment, or patient refusal. We assessed the safety and efficacy of UFT for TC. Results: Four patients were female and seven were male. The age ranged from 41 to 77 years. The histological features of TC were squamous cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinomas. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in one patient. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Among the 11 patients, 6, 2, and 3 had a partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. The objective response rate was 54.5%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival of patients who received UFT chemotherapy were 8.16 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76–15.56 months) and 19.43 months (95% CI: 17.07–21.78 months), respectively. Conclusion: Single-agent UFT seems to have potential effectiveness and good tolerability in patients with recurrent or advanced TC.
Keywords: Adverse effect, chemotherapy, thymic carcinoma, uracil-tegafur
How to cite this article:
Huang SY, Huang CH, Su HY, Chen YH, Chiu TJ, Chen YY. Efficacy and safety of uracil-tegafur in patients with recurrent or metastatic thymic carcinoma. J Cancer Res Pract 2020;7:111-5 |
How to cite this URL:
Huang SY, Huang CH, Su HY, Chen YH, Chiu TJ, Chen YY. Efficacy and safety of uracil-tegafur in patients with recurrent or metastatic thymic carcinoma. J Cancer Res Pract [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 23];7:111-5. Available from: https://www.ejcrp.org/text.asp?2020/7/3/111/294015 |
| Introduction | |  |
Thymic epithelial neoplasms are uncommon thoracic cancers, with a worldwide incidence of 0.13–0.32/100,000 people annually. Primary thymic carcinoma (TC) was first reported in 1982, when it was considered to be thymoma.[1] Thymoma and thymic carcinoid tumors are indolent and are limited to the chest cavity. In contrast, TC tends to behave more aggressively, with frequent adjacent organ involvement and disseminated metastases, which results in significantly worse prognoses.[2] The World Health Organization (WHO) histopathological classification in 2004 classified TC as a distinct entity from thymoma. Histologically, TCs, defined as thymic epithelial counterparts of thymomas, have malignant cytologic features without a normal lymphocytic component (immature T cells).[3] They are predominantly squamous cell carcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas. TCs occur frequently between the ages of 30 and 60 years, but they can occur at any age and more frequently in men than in women (ratio 1.5:1).[4],[5] Myasthenia gravis is uncommonly observed in TCs.
Although physicians follow the WHO classification in determining the approach for TC patients, there is still no standard treatment. Taking part in clinical trials is encouraged. According to the current clinical practice, for Stage I–III and selected oligo-metastatic Stage IV disease, multidisciplinary management including surgical resection ± concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is recommended.[6] Carboplatin/paclitaxel (CbP) and cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide (ADOC) regimens are recommended as first-line therapy for TCs based on the NCCN guidelines.[7] However, data on cases who fail platinum-based or anthracycline-based chemotherapy are currently lacking.
Considering the potential association between Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection and TCs, although controversial, one small study in Taiwan showed a significant response rate and survival in unresectable TC patients who underwent CCRT with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin combined regimen.[8] The efficacy of 5-FU and its prodrug-containing S-1 in recurrent TC has been reported in several case reports and some small case series.[9],[10],[11],[12] Uracil-tegafur (UFT) also contains the prodrug of 5-FU, developed to improve the antitumor activity. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of UFT in patients with recurrent or metastatic TC.
| Materials and Methods | | |
Patients and treatment
This retrospective study was approved by Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board that waived the requirement to obtain informed consent (IRB No. 202000096B0). A total of 11 patients were diagnosed with recurrent or advanced TC and treated with UFT between 2017 and 2019 in our hospital. Four patients were female and seven were male. The age range was between 41 and 77 years. The histologic features of TC were squamous cell carcinomas and poorly differentiated carcinomas. All patients were treated with UFT as either first-line or later-line regimens. Two patients received UFT as first-line treatment because of their age, poor performance status, and refusal to receive intravenous chemotherapy. Nine of the 11 patients had been previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Our planned dose of UFT was 200 mg b.i.d., 3 weeks on, and 1 week off. The dose was de-escalated to 100 mg b.i.d. or 100 mg t.i.d. if the patient experienced Grade 3 toxicity or was intolerant to the planned dose.
Response evaluation and endpoints
All the enrolled patients visited clinics regularly during the treatment period until disease progression, treatment intolerance, or death. Follow-up visits included a physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. Computed tomography of the chest was the preferred imaging tool to assess tumor response, using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PF) was defined as the interval between the initial day of UFT treatment and the day of disease progression or any event-related death. Overall survival was defined as the time interval from the day of receiving UFT to the date of death or last contact with the patient. Observed toxicities during UFT were evaluated before each treatment cycle and were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 10.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). We constructed overall and PF curves using the Kaplan–Meier method.
| Results | | |
Patient characteristics
The median age of the 11 patients was 66 years (range: 41–77 years). The histologic subtype included squamous cell carcinomas (n = 9) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (n = 2). All patients had previously received chemotherapy (one or more regimens), except for patients 1 and 2. Patient 2 received postoperative regional radiotherapy before recurrence of the disease. Eight patients were treated with a cisplatin-based regimen either alone or as part of CCRT. Five patients had previously been treated with a 5-FU combination regimen. The basic characteristics of the 11 patients are shown in [Table 1]. | Table 1: Clinical characteristics, histopathology, and treatment modalities of the 11 patients
Click here to view |
Toxicity and dose delivery
All patients had good tolerability to oral UFT 200 mg b.i.d., except for one patient, who had the dose reduced to 100 mg b.i.d. due to performance status and old age. There were no treatment-related hospitalizations or deaths [Table 2]. The Grade 3 toxicity of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was limited and resolved after treatment interruption. One patient (patient 8) discontinued treatment because of Grade 3 adverse events. His disease status slowly progressed with pleural effusion after treatment discontinuation. | Table 2: The uracil-tegafur-associated hematological and nonhematological adverse events
Click here to view |
Efficacy
The median PF and overall survival were 8.16 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76–15.56 months) and 19.43 months (95% CI: 17.07–21.78 months), respectively[Figure 1]. Six patients had a partial response (n = 6, 54.5%), stable disease (SD) was noted in two patients (n = 2, 18.1%), and three patients had progressive disease (n = 3, 27.2%) [Table 3]. Patient 5 had a significant response to lung metastases after UFT treatment for 3 months as fifth-line chemotherapy. The chest X-ray is shown in [Figure 2]. | Figure 1: The survival curve of the patients with advanced thymic carcinoma treated with uracil-tegafur (n = 11). Kaplan–Meier curve shows (a) the progression-free survival (median: 8.1 months) and (b) overall survival (median: 19.4 months)
Click here to view |
 | Table 3: The response and survivals of uracil-tegafur in advanced thymic carcinoma patients
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: Chest X-ray showing significant tumor regression after three cycles of uracil-tegafur treatment. Multiple lung metastases were noted before uracil-tegafur (left) and all decreased tumor size after 3 months uracil-tegafur (right)
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
TCs have heterogeneous histologic features, and their subtypes include squamous cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and rare variants such as basaloid carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, anaplastic carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and rhabdoid carcinoma.[4] The clinical course of TCs tends to be more aggressive than that of ordinary thymoma. Nearly 80% of TC patients have been reported to have an anterior mediastinal mass invading the contiguous structure with presentations including cough, chest pain, phrenic nerve palsy, or superior vena cava syndrome. Approximately 40% of cases involve spread to the lymph nodes, pleura, pericardium, lungs, liver, and bones.[13] The survival rate for TCs varies depending on stage (stages 1–2: 91%; stages 3–4: 31%) and resectability (R0 resection).[14]
For patients with advanced thymic neoplasms, based on previously published retrospective and prospective studies, the ADOC regimen is recommended as first-line therapy because it has demonstrated better response and survival rates. One small study enrolled a total of eight Japanese patients with advanced TCs, all of whom were treated with the ADOC regimen. Six of the eight patients obtained a partial response after ADOC chemotherapy, the overall clinical response rate was 75%, and the median survival time was 19 months.[15] In a multicenter prospective study, CbP in previously untreated patients with advanced TC also resulted in a significant overall response rate of 36% (one complete response and 13 partial responses) and a median PF of 8.1 months (5.4–13.1). The 2-year survival rate was 71% (95% CI, 54%–83%).[16] However, some details should be taken into consideration. First, most previous studies grouped thymomas together with TCs, which makes interpreting the efficacy in TC-specific patients difficult. Second, the different geographical areas (Taiwan vs. Western countries) may mean there were differences in the epidemiology, prevalence, and etiology of TCs.
The EBV is a ubiquitous B-cell lymphocytic virus that can replicate in epithelial cells and is strongly associated with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas, which tend to appear in Southern China, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. As an undifferentiated tumor, lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the thymus has histopathological characteristics similar to those of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas. In 1985, Leyvraz et al. first addressed the possible association between TC and EBV.[17] Although the association is still controversial, a single case and small series studies of the presence of EBV in lymphoepithelioma-like TC have been reported in both Western[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] and Asian[23],[24],[25],[26] countries. Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and FU (PF) has been widely used as a first-line regimen in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients for many years. Therefore, PF has been discussed as a potentially effective regimen for TCs. Chen et al. reported 29 patients with unresectable TC receiving CCRT with a PF regimen, and four (25.0%) patients had complete responses and four (25.0%) had partial responses. The overall cumulative survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 93.8%, 81.3%, 74.5%, and 67.7%, respectively.[8] No large randomized trial has yet been conducted because of the rarity of the disease.
In addition to first-line therapy, several studies have evaluated salvage chemotherapy in recurrent or platinum-refractory TCs. Litvak et al. reported the results of 11 TC patients treated with pemetrexed, who had neither responses nor survival benefits, and the median time to progression was 5.1 weeks.[27] Koizumi et al. reported six relapsed TC patients who were treated with amrubicin, an anthracycline, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, of whom two had partial responses, and the median PF and overall survival were 4.5 and 9 months, respectively.[28] Komatsu et al. reported three patients with advanced TC who had previously received an ADOC regimen and received carboplatin plus paclitaxel combination therapy as second- or third-line chemotherapy, of whom two showed partial responses and one had SD.[29] Currently, there are no effective agents for patients who fail to receive platinum-based or anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Thus, it is necessary to explore novel drugs and treatment strategies to improve the current circumstances. Prolonged administration of metronomic chemotherapy at relatively low drug doses, at shorter intervals in consecutive doses, and without interruption in order to exert a sustained cytotoxic or apoptotic effect, has been proposed. The antitumor mechanism is thought to be the inhibition of angiogenesis, stimulating adaptive T, possibly innate NK cell-mediated immunity and direct tumor cell killing.[30]
S-1 contains tegafur as a prodrug of 5-FU and has been shown to have clinical efficacy for NSCLC patients as postoperative adjuvant therapy as well as palliative chemotherapy in unresectable disease. Therefore, some studies have reported that S-1 may have potential effectiveness in TCs. Wang et al. analyzed salvage monotherapy with S-1 in Stage IV TC patients. Among 44 patients, the disease control rate was 80% (30% of PR and 50% of SD), and the median PF and overall survival were 6 months and 15 months, respectively. However, nine patients had rapid progression and six patients had grade ≥3 bone marrow suppression.[12] Similarly, acting as a metronomic chemotherapy agent, UFT is an orally administered 5-FU derivative drug composed of tegafur and uracil in a 1:4 molar ratio. It has been approved for several cancers such as breast, lung, head and neck, gastric, and colon cancers as either adjuvant or palliative therapy. However, no previous study has investigated the efficacy of UFT for advanced thymic TC. Thus, we analyzed the feasibility and response of UFT as palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic and recurrent TC. Although our analysis was a retrospective study and the number of cases was small and limited, the response rate of all patients treated with UFT was 54% and the median PF was longer than 8 months. Regarding toxicity, only one patient had interruption of UFT due to Grade 3 adverse events. No hematological or nonhematological adverse events were observed.
| Conclusion | | |
UFT seems to have potential effectiveness and to be less toxic than anthracycline-based regimens or S-1-based chemotherapy.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Snover DC, Levine GD, Rosai J. Thymic carcinoma. Five distinctive histological variants. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:451-70.  |
| 2. | Kondo K, Monden Y. Therapy for thymic epithelial tumors: A clinical study of 1,320 patients from Japan. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:878-84. |
| 3. | Travis WD. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. International Academy of Pathology. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. LyonOxford: IARC Press, Oxford University Press (distributor); 2004. p. 344. |
| 4. | Moran CA, Suster S. Thymic carcinoma: Current concepts and histologic features. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008;22:393-407. |
| 5. | Suster S, Rosai J. Thymic carcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 60 cases. Cancer 1991;67:1025-32. |
| 6. | Weiss GJ. Thymic carcinoma: Current and future therapeutic interventions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2010;19:1007-16. |
| 7. | NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology ™ Thymic Malignancies; V.2.2018. |
| 8. | Chen YY, Huang CH, Tang Y, Eng HL. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable thymic carcinoma. Chang Gung Med J 2004;27:515-22. |
| 9. | Hirai F, Seto T, Inamasu E, Toyokawa G, Yoshida T, Nosaki K, et al. Results of S-1-based chemotherapy for platinum (and antrathycline)-refractory advanced thymic carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2014;34:5743-7. |
| 10. | Okuma Y, Hosomi Y, Miyamoto S, Shibuya M, Okamura T, Hishima T. Correlation between S-1 treatment outcome and expression of biomarkers for refractory thymic carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2016;16:156. |
| 11. | Tanaka H, Morimoto T, Taima K, Tanaka Y, Nakamura K, Hayashi A, et al. The long-term survival of a thymic carcinoma patient treated with S-1: A case report and literature review. Onco Targets Ther 2013;7:87-90. |
| 12. | Wang CL, Gao LT, Lu CX. S-1 salvage chemotherapy for stage IV thymic carcinoma: A study of 44 cases. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:2816-21. |
| 13. | Srirajaskanthan R, Toubanakis C, Dusmet M, Caplin ME. A review of thymic tumours. Lung Cancer 2008;60:4-13. |
| 14. | Litvak AM, Woo K, Hayes S, Huang J, Rimner A, Sima CS, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with thymic carcinoma: Evaluation of Masaoka staging. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:1810-5. |
| 15. | Koizumi T, Takabayashi Y, Yamagishi S, Tsushima K, Takamizawa A, Tsukadaira A, et al. Chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma: Clinical response to cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide (ADOC chemotherapy). Am J Clin Oncol 2002;25:266-8. |
| 16. | Hirai F, Yamanaka T, Taguchi K, Daga H, Ono A, Tanaka K, et al. A multicenter phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced thymic carcinoma: WJOG4207L. Ann Oncol 2015;26:363-8. |
| 17. | Leyvraz S, Henle W, Chahinian AP, Perlmann C, Klein G, Gordon RE, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus with thymic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1296-9. |
| 18. | Dimery IW, Lee JS, Blick M, Pearson G, Spitzer G, Hong WK. Association of the Epstein-Barr virus with lymphoepithelioma of the thymus. Cancer 1988;61:2475-80. |
| 19. | Inghirami G, Chilosi M, Knowles DM. Western thymomas lack Epstein-Barr virus by Southern blotting analysis and by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Pathol 1990;136:1429-36. |
| 20. | Borisch B, Kirchner T, Marx A, Müller-Hermelink HK. Absence of the Epstein-Barr virus genome in the normal thymus, thymic epithelial tumors, thymic lymphoid hyperplasia in a European population. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1990;59:359-65. |
| 21. | Mann RB, Wu TC, MacMahon EM, Ling Y, Charache P, Ambinder RF. In situ localization of Epstein-Barr virus in thymic carcinoma. Mod Pathol 1992;5:363-6. |
| 22. | Engel PJ. Absence of latent Epstein-Barr virus in thymic epithelial tumors as demonstrated by Epstein-Barr-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization. APMIS 2000;108:393-7. |
| 23. | McGuire LJ, Huang DP, Teoh R, Arnold M, Wong K, Lee JC. Epstein-Barr virus genome in thymoma and thymic lymphoid hyperplasia. Am J Pathol 1988;131:385-90. |
| 24. | Chen PC, Pan CC, Yang AH, Wang LS, Chiang H. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus genome within thymic epithelial tumours in Taiwanese patients by nested PCR, PCR in situ hybridization, and RNA in situ hybridization. J Pathol 2002;197:684-8. |
| 25. | Wu TC, Kuo TT. Study of Epstein-Barr virus early RNA 1 (EBER1) expression by in situ hybridization in thymic epithelial tumors of Chinese patients in Taiwan. Hum Pathol 1993;24:235-8. |
| 26. | Matsuno Y, Mukai K, Uhara H, Akao I, Furuya S, Sato Y, et al. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in a Japanese case of lymphoepithelioma-like thymic carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res 1992;83:127-30. |
| 27. | Gbolahan OB, Porter RF, Salter JT, Yiannoutsos C, Burns M, Chiorean EG, et al. A Phase II Study of Pemetrexed in Patients with Recurrent Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1940-8. |
| 28. | Koizumi T, Agatsuma T, Ichiyama T, Yokoyama T, Ushiki A, Komatsu Y, et al. Salvage chemotherapy with amrubicin and platinum for relapsed thymic carcinoma: Experience in six cases. Med Oncol 2010;27:392-6. |
| 29. | Komatsu Y, Koizumi T, Tanabe T, Hatayama O, Yasuo M, Okada M, et al. Salvage chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for cisplatin-resistant thymic carcinoma-three cases. Anticancer Res 2006;26:4851-5. |
| 30. | Simsek C, Esin E, Yalcin S. Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience. Journal of Oncology. 2019;2019:5483791. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|
Search Pubmed for